Monday, 17 October 2022

Chaotic British leadership shuffle reflects democratic disappearing act

 


The imminent defenestration of the hapless Liz Truss that will end her flash premiership after mere weeks will result in the year’s third U.K. prime minister who, unlike the previous two, will have not been elected by anyone. Truss, for all her manifold faults, at least won a legitimizing vote in her favor by the Tory party membership. Boris Johnson, preceding her, was the beneficiary of a general election in which the country resoundingly opted for his party’s continuation in power.

Truss was famously engraved in memory by being the last person to appear publicly with the late Queen Elizabeth. But while QE edges even closer to immortality than she did while alive, we will soon wonder if LT ever existed at all.

Meanwhile, on our side of the Atlantic, we trudge grimly toward an election whose results seem guaranteed to resolve nothing about who should captain the ship of state. Election night returns, that core element of democratic rule, will be challenged in courts throughout the land. Ostensible winners will be promptly denied and discredited before the ballot inks are dry. Some losers will say the vote totals were rigged; others that the computerized voting systems are hackable, perhaps by foreign geniuses; and still others that the voting arrangements were cynically calculated to deny hostile blocs access to the urns.

Even where numerical vote totals seem more or less accurately to reflect voter choice, we will remain shadowed by hoary traditions like the blatant gerrymander, the plague of the Electoral College, and the ongoing usurpation by a Supreme Court determined to re-legislate the last 50 years, wielding a majority installed by a minority-vote president.

While we are rallied to support overseas war-making as a defense of “democracy” versus some sort of oriental authoritarianism, citizens of the collective West enjoy less of it than ever. If the Republicans retake control of the Senate—which I anticipate—the filibuster (that Democrats insist on treating as hallowed tradition) will be quickly jettisoned into the dustbin of history, and a new GOP legislative-judicial dictatorship will show us how the Will to Power really works.

Why is democracy failing us so badly and broadly and not just us but Europeans, too? They face a hungry and frigid winter but will be treated only to bland phrases and non-solutions from the unelected EU pooh-bahs who regularly overrule their presidents and prime ministers, increasingly reduced to figureheads and placeholders.

I suggest that it is because the failures of late financialized capitalism are now impossible to ignore and that “the will of the people” cannot be satisfied under current conditions. Whatever voters may want and manage to articulate in their voting choices, the political classes of the collective West cannot provide it. There is no prosperity, no healthy growth, no essential services, no social cohesion, no infrastructural modernization, no cooperative mobilization (e.g., for climate change), and certainly no peace possible as long as we continue to tolerate the dictatorship of concentrated wealth that now marks our world. While we scrap over transgender bathrooms and mass imprisonment, who is tougher on crime and who knows how to raise children, bloated plutocrats steadily push us toward a neo-feudalism in which only the incalculably rich retain any agency over their own lives.

The bright side of this march cliff-ward is that our capacity for belief is rapidly shrinking, and that is a very good thing. Undoubtedly, this growing skepticism towards officialdom is accompanied by many “morbid symptoms” as Gramsci warned are characteristic of an imploding system. We enjoy marveling at the credulousness of the adversary but will gradually appreciate where we ourselves have bought the shiny object and will discover fraud.

This weekend, I attended a fundraiser for the New York Progressive Action Network, which grew out of the 2016 Bernie campaign. It continues to advocate for popular (and populist) policies in health, education, housing, labor, transportation, and the like. Unfortunately, the speeches were almost exclusively from or about elected officials, and while speakers occasionally warned that we would not “play along” with the establishment Democrats forever, the focus of the event was to keep doing exactly that. We need a more expansive vision.

As stated above, I fully expect next months’ midterms to result in the Democrat wipe-out that some Pollyannas continue to think can yet be avoided. A party with such a stellar record of failure cannot expect to avoid total discredit; but the other one’s will follow in due course, and we should lament neither. Those empty suits are mere hod-carriers to the real elites, and we needn’t take them seriously. Their role is to inflame emotions and distract us from the dysfunction at the core of our social arrangements. The sooner we see through them, the faster we will begin to formulate alternatives.